Skip to main content
The Markets by Proactive
Go to Proactive UK
Proactive UK has moved. Proactive’s coverage of London’s small caps continues on proactiveinvestors.com Go there →
Advertisement
The Markets
by Proactive
Proactive UK has moved.
Coverage of London’s small caps continues on proactiveinvestors.com
Go to Proactive UK
The Markets
by Proactive
Proactive UK has moved.
Small-cap coverage continues on .com
Go to Proactive UK
Advertisement
The Markets
by Proactive
Proactive UK has moved.
Small-cap coverage continues on .com
Go to Proactive UK

Archive

Lloyds Banking Group among the fresh intake for year two of "Dogs of the Footsie"

The new intake to the "Dogs of the Footsie" contains some stocks that, infamously, have slashed or cut their dividends in the past, and some that look likely to do so in the future

On Monday, we detailed the first year of Proactive Investors’ take on a UK version of the highly successful “Dogs of the Dow” investment strategy.

It is now time to refresh the portfolio by running the screen again, getting rid of those constituents that no longer fit the bill and replacing them with those that do.

You can read how the virtual portfolio did last year, and also the concept behind the “Dogs of the Dow” and the changes we made to the system, in the articles linked to below.

READ: Bumper year for the big ticket “Dogs of the Footsie”

READ: Selectively breeding the Dogs of the Footsie

READ: Cry havoc and let loose the Dogs of the Footsie

Out with the old dogs

A screen was run on the FTSE 100 stocks, looking for companies that had dividend cover – based on broker forecasts of this year’s earnings and dividends – of at 1.5.

The companies were then ranked in order of yield, with the highest yielder at the top.

As a result of this, the following existing “Dogs of the Footsie” were jettisoned: AstraZeneca, Barratt Development, Capita Group (no longer a FTSE 100 company - and it might not stay in the FTSE 250 for long, either, the way things are going), Royal Mail (ditto), Taylor Wimpey and TUI AG.

Their replacements were: Evraz, Lloyds Banking Group, ITV, Aviva, WPP and Berkeley Group.

I’ve owned at least two of those when they summarily slashed or binned their dividends, but whatever my misgivings about Lloyds and Aviva, this is a mechanical investment system so they make it into the portfolio.

The table below lists the prices at which the ex-dogs were sold (and the receipts raised) and the prices at which the new dogs were bought.

Comings and goings in the "Dogs of the Footsie" portfolio

Old dogs

Sold at

Receipts

New dogs

Bought at

AstraZeneca

5075p

£1,152.5

Evraz

380p

Barratt Developments

606.2p

£1,233.77

Lloyds Banking

70.56p

BT Group

Retained

Capita Group

351.7

£677.85

ITV

169.45

Legal & General

Retained

Marks & Spencer

Retained

Persimmon

Retained

Royal Mail

466.8

£1,100.65

Aviva

520.4p

Taylor Wimpey

195.7

£1,137

WPP

1,289p

TUI AG

1,614.5

£1,341.18

Berkeley

4,063p

I suspect that were I adhering 100% to Michael O’Higgins’s “Dogs of the Dow” system, I would have sold all 10 stocks and then bought an equal amount of the “new” 10, even though four of those “new” stocks – BT, Legal & General, Marks & Spencer and Persimmon – are, in fact, the old stocks returning for another year.

In this virtual portfolio I am factoring in dealing costs of £15 for each transaction and also using bid/offer prices in a vague attempt at realism, and so selling four stocks (with dealing charges at £15 a pop) and then buying them back (ditto) would waste £120 so I elected not to do that (even though it is only virtual money).

After selling the six stocks the portfolio had cash of £6,700, and the total value of the portfolio, including cash, was £11,492, which meant that, in theory, the average “cost of holding” for each stock should be £1,149.20.

The four stocks retained from last year’s “Dogs” portfolio only had £1,000 invested in them, so in theory I should have topped up each holding by £150, but as 10% (i.e. £15) of each top-up would immediately be swallowed up by dealing costs, I elected to do what I would have done in real life, as a fully paid-up cheapskate, and invested the available cash in the new stocks and left the initial stakes in the carry-over stocks unchanged.

If you are “trying this at home” feel free to adopt whichever system you feel most comfortable with.

Having unequal investments in each stock does confuse the issue when trying to determine who the best performers are, but as we only care about that from an idle curiosity point of view, who gives the proverbial flying one?

So, following all of that ducking and diving, here’s what the new portfolio looks like.

Selectively bred dogs of the Footsie – year two

Company

No. of shares

Total cost

Average price paid

Current bid price

Current value

Profit/ loss £

Profit/ loss %

Aviva

231

£1,217

526.89p

520p

£1,201

-£16

-1.3%

Berkeley Group

29

£1,193

4,114.72p

4,063p

£1,178

-£15

-1.3%

BT Group

323

£1,002

310.15p

258.15p

£834

-£168

-17%

Evraz

316

£1,216

384.75p

379.8p

£1,200

-£16

-1.3%

ITV

708

£1,215

171.57p

169.25p

£1,198

-£16

-1.4%

Legal & General

419

£1,000

238.78p

272.9p

£1,143

£143

14%

Lloyds Banking

1,701

£1,215

71.44p

70.51p

£1,199

-£15

-1.3%

Marks & Spencer

293

£999

341.02p

306.5p

£898

-£101

-10%

Persimmon

51

£1,000

1,960.41p

2,567p

£1,309

£309

31%

WPP

94

£1,227

1,304.96p

1,290p

£1,213

-£14

-1.2%

(Companies listed in italics have been retained from the year one portfolio)

  • Cash: £13
  • Current market value of portfolio (including cash): £11,388
Advertisement
The Markets
by Proactive
Proactive UK has moved.
Small-cap coverage continues on .com
Go to Proactive UK