Add to watchlist:

Only registered members can add into watchlist !

Register here !
Deal Pearson Tax Free* Losses can exceed
your initial deposit
*subject to change and depends on individual circumstances.
Pearson is an international media company with market-leading businesses in education, business information and consumer publishing.

Pearson worth persevering with, Goldman Sachs says

Pearson has more attractive longer-term growth potential than fellow publisher Reed Elsevier (LON:REL) and yet trades on similar multiples, Goldman Sachs claims

Financial Times and Penguin books owner Pearson (LON:PSON) is mostly friendless this morning after a downbeat trading update, but Goldman Sachs is staying loyal.

It reiterated its ‘buy’ recommendation and urged its clients to ignore short-term headwinds and focus on the long-term attractions.

The US investment bank expects earnings per share (EPS) to be flat year-on-year (yoy) in 2013 but should kick on in 2014, driven by cost synergies from the Penguin joint venture (JV) with Random House and the contribution of acquisitions made last year, such as Embanet.

In Goldman Sachs’s scenario, 2014 EPS should rise 18% from 2013’s level.

“We believe that the market will start looking to 2014 once Pearson reports its final results in February. Clarity on restructuring costs should help narrow a wide consensus EPS range. In the short term, potential asset disposals from within the FT Group could be enhancing if accompanied by a capital return. We believe that Pearson will continue to outperform its peers in College, especially as Cengage (the number 2 player) reported a c.20% yoy drop in sales at 3Q and has net debt/EBITDA of 7.7x. The Schools market is likely to be boosted by the Common Curriculum,” Goldman Sachs said.

The bank argues that Pearson has more attractive longer-term growth potential than fellow publisher Reed Elsevier (LON:REL) and yet trades on similar multiples.

“Our 12-month price target of 1,510p (unchanged) is based on 15x 2014 P/E [price/earnings], implying 22% upside. We see scope for a re-rating as Pearson’s organic growth improves and the market starts to focus on its longer-term strategy,” the bank’s number crunchers conclude.

Shares in Pearson were down 40p to 1,198p in mid-morning trade, after revealing it will report flat profits this year after tough trading in the final quarter, which it cautioned is set to continue into 2013.

No investment advice

The Company is a publisher. You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. You further understand that none of the information providers or their affiliates will advise you personally concerning the nature, potential, advisability, value or suitability of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, investment strategy, or other matter.

You understand that the Site may contain opinions from time to time with regard to securities mentioned in other products, including company related products, and that those opinions may be different from those obtained by using another product related to the Company. You understand and agree that contributors may write about securities in which they or their firms have a position, and that they may trade such securities for their own account. In cases where the position is held at the time of publication and such position is known to the Company, appropriate disclosure is made. However, you understand and agree that at the time of any transaction that you make, one or more contributors may have a position in the securities written about. You understand that price and other data is supplied by sources believed to be reliable, that the calculations herein are made using such data, and that neither such data nor such calculations are guaranteed by these sources, the Company, the information providers or any other person or entity, and may not be complete or accurate.

From time to time, reference may be made in our marketing materials to prior articles and opinions we have published. These references may be selective, may reference only a portion of an article or recommendation, and are likely not to be current. As markets change continuously, previously published information and data may not be current and should not be relied upon.