Additional Information
Market: LSE
Sector: Energy
EPIC: ENQ
Latest Price: 119.10p  (0.93% Ascending)
52-week High: 137.40p
52-week Low: 84.35p
Market Cap: 955.97M
1 year chart
1 day chart
Watchlist/Portfolio

Add to watchlist:

Only registered members can add into watchlist !

Register here !
Enquest
www.enquest.com
EnQuest PLC is an independent oil & gas production and development company focused on the UK Continental Shelf (‘UKCS’).

EnQuest believes that the UKCS represents a significant hydrocarbon basin in a low-risk region which benefits from an extensive installed infrastructure base and skilled labour.  The 2009 Oil & Gas UK Economic Report estimated that at January 1, 2009, the projected reserves and resources still to be recovered from the UKCS were between 15.5 and 25 billion barrels of oil equivalent.
Pdf

North Sea consolidation reflects funding challenges among juniors

24th Jan 2012, 2:26 pm by Jamie Ashcroft Operationally, many juniors are performing well, successfully finding, appraising and in some cases, even producing oil, on a shoe-string budget.

It seems consolidation is very much on the agenda for North Sea oil firms at the moment.

We’ve already seen a number of significant developments over the past few weeks, most notably Premier Oil’s (LON:PMO) £221 million takeover of EnCore Oil (LON:EO.) which was agreed in October.

Since the turn of the year things have stepped up a gear. 

First, EnQuest took the plunge buying a 20 per cent stake in Nautical Petroleum’s (LON:NPE) Kraken field for US$90 million. 

Then, this morning, EnQuest agreed a US$240 million deal to buy a further 25 per cent of Kraken and take control of the project.

It follows yesterday’s news from Ithaca Energy (LON:IAE), which is hoping to start production from the Athena field later this year, that it was in confidential talks with a potential bidder.

It is something of a perfect storm that’s creating such a favourable environment for M&A.

Operationally, many juniors are performing well, successfully finding, appraising and in some cases, even producing oil, on a shoe-string budget.  

But making it big and completing the transformation into a fully fledged E&P company is becoming more difficult.

The broader economy has played its part. Austere lending practices and economic uncertainty has depressed share prices and as a result many undeveloped oil assets are now quite undervalued. 

This, in most cases, makes large equity based funding too dilutive to be a viable option. On top of that traditional debt project financing is scarce.

As a result, firms have to look at alternative funding options.

For North Sea oil firms in particular, this issue is more acute as the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) requires that financing is in place before any development plan can be approved.

Meanwhile on the other side larger more established firms, as ever, need to replenish their reserves as their existing oilfields mature and slowly dry up. 

Unlike private investors and the banks, these larger oil firms have both the means and appetite to fund new development projects, particularly when asset values have fallen so low and they can pick up a bargain.

Today’s deal, between EnQuest and Nautical, is a case in point.

The deal has a US$6 a barrel price tag, before factoring in tax considerations, and US$2.4 a barrel afterwards. 

Also that deal is priced on notably better terms than EnQuest’s US$90 million deal for its initial 20 per cent stake.

Combining both deals EnQuest believes it will have increased its contingent oil resources by around 70 per cent. This will be achieved by spending £330 million at most.

That said, the transaction is still good for Nautical as it has now overcome the funding challenge and it can proceed with its flagship project without diluting equity holders or taking on a heavy debt burden.

Numis Securities reckons the deal is positive for both parties. The broker believes that Kraken is a relatively low risk development and with EnQuest at the helm, first oil may be achieved in late 2015 or early 2016, it said.

Analyst Mathew Lambourne says a significant portion of the funding risk has now been removed and as a result the market will have more confidence in Kraken’s commercial success.

“The size of the farmdown is in line with our expectations, and leaves Nautical with a material exposure to Kraken but without a capex liability that is prohibitively expensive,” Lambourne said.

Given that Nautical's share of the phase one capex costs is now estimated to be US$225 million, Lambourne believes that today’s deal is likely to cover Nautical’s entire liability – providing the oil reserves are sufficient to trigger the contingent part of the deal.

Should Nautical need any more cash to cover its liabilities then, Lambourne says, a reserve-backed debt deal or the sale of non-core assets could fund the development.

Meanwhile, there are several significant oilfield development plays that have yet to secure funding, and a number of market experts believe that share prices may continue to underperform, versus asset valuations.

If this is the case more stocks could be seen as attractive takeover targets for their larger cash-rich rivals as they keep looking for cheap oil in the ground. So it seems that at this early stage there could be plenty more consolidation in the months ahead.

No investment advice

The Company is a publisher and is not registered with or authorised by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. You further understand that none of the information providers or their affiliates will advise you personally concerning the nature, potential, advisability, value or suitability of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, investment strategy, or other matter.

You understand that the Site may contain opinions from time to time with regard to securities mentioned in other products, including company related products, and that those opinions may be different from those obtained by using another product related to the Company. You understand and agree that contributors may write about securities in which they or their firms have a position, and that they may trade such securities for their own account. In cases where the position is held at the time of publication and such position is known to the Company, appropriate disclosure is made. However, you understand and agree that at the time of any transaction that you make, one or more contributors may have a position in the securities written about. You understand that price and other data is supplied by sources believed to be reliable, that the calculations herein are made using such data, and that neither such data nor such calculations are guaranteed by these sources, the Company, the information providers or any other person or entity, and may not be complete or accurate.

From time to time, reference may be made in our marketing materials to prior articles and opinions we have published. These references may be selective, may reference only a portion of an article or recommendation, and are likely not to be current. As markets change continuously, previously published information and data may not be current and should not be relied upon.