Additional Information
Market: AIM
Sector: Energy
EPIC: RPT
Latest Price: 22.50p  (-1.13% Descending)
52-week High: 51.75p
52-week Low: 21.00p
Market Cap: 72.14M
1 year chart
1 day chart
Watchlist/Portfolio

Add to watchlist:

Only registered members can add into watchlist !

Register here !
Regal Petroleum
www.regalpetroleum.co.uk

Regal Petroleum's primary assets are two large gas and condensate fields in Ukraine - the Mekhediviska-Golotvschinska (MEX-GOL) field and the Svyrydivske (SV) field located in the prolific Dneipner-Donets basin in the north east of Ukraine. Regal is the operator of the assets and there are currently 5 production wells on the assets. Secondary to this, but still significant, are two large exploration blocks in Romania, the Barlad and Suceava Blocks, where Regal holds a 100% and 50% interest respectively.

Regal Petroleum also has a 25% non-operated joint venture in Egypt with Apache Khalda Corporation LDC, where an exploration well tested positively for oil in September 2007 and was tied in as a producing well in June 2008.

Pdf

Regal Petroleum: New twist in Ukrainian takeover stand-off

18th Jan 2011, 9:46 am Regal has already recommended a 24 pence cash takeover bid from Ukrainian firm Energees Management which is expected to close next week

 

Victor Pinchuk’s alternative proposal to acquire Regal Petroleum (LON:RPT) could create a much larger, AIM-listed, Ukrainian oil and gas firm.

This morning Regal revealed that it has been in talks with the Ukrainian oligarch, who has made alternative proposals to buy the company, instead of the 24 pence per share recommended bid from Energees Management.

Pinchuk, via Cyrus incorporated vehicles Heamoor and Geo-Alliance, is prepared to out-bid Energees. He is prepared to pay 25 pence per Regal share via two alternative proposals.

One proposal sees a reverse takeover into Geo-Alliance - which itself owns 16 oil and gas fields in Ukraine - with an option for shareholders to sell their shares at 25 pence for three months. The other would be a straight cash takeover, also priced at 25 pence.

Throughout its colourful, and sometimes tumultuous, past things have rarely been straightforward for Regal Petroleum and with Energees’ cash bid set to close next week and a potential counter-bid lingering in the background, this isn’t likely to change any time soon. 

At the moment there are several possible outcomes for Regal.

Firstly, and perhaps the most straightforward, is that sufficient numbers of investors accept the recommended 24 pence takeover bid from Energees. The company would then be sold to the Ukrainian firm.

This afternoon, presenting itself as the proverbial bird-in-hand, Energees responded to the latest twist by reiterating its position. 

The Ukrainian group reminded investors that it is still the only firm bidder for Regal.

In a plea to Regal’s investors on the London Stock Exchange, Energees emphasised that Pinchuks alternative proposals are complex, they are subject to ‘substantial conditionality’ and they carry significant risks. 

Indeed, the potential takeover will become more complicated if the Energees bid does not get enough support from investors - or Victor Pinchuk tables a firm superior offer.

There are two key facets to both proposals from Pinchuk. First the oligarch plans to out-bid Energees, albeit by just one pence per share. In what is perhaps a telling detail, the alternative proposals set a lower acceptance level for investors -  they require 50 percent of the shareholder vote which is less than the 90 percent Energees will need on Monday.

The first of Pinchuk’s two proposals would see Geo-Alliance reverse into Regal Petroleum, whilst also allowing investors to sell their shares for 25 pence for three months.

This deal would combine the assets of both Ukrainian oil and gas firms. Geo-Alliance owns 16 gas fields in Ukraine. 

In a separate statement to Regal’s investors on the London stock exchange, Geo-Alliance highlighted that it produced around 810 million cubic metres of gas per day in the fourth quarter of 2010. The firm plans to expand this further with a new well slated for February.

These assets would undoubtedly provide a boon to Regal’s current operational situation, which has come to a standstill after it experienced a number of problems.

Firstly it ran into technical gas recovery issues, with gas output from new wells failing to meet expectations. It has since carried out a full review of its operations. The review concluded that the development of its Ukrainian asset requires further technical studies and it would need to trial alternative well completion technologies - such as hydraulic fracturing.

The company has also been involved in a drawn out dispute with the Ukrainian authorities, which resulted in a suspension order being issued by the Ukrainian Ministry of Environmental Protection. Consequently the Ukrainian assets are currently shut-in and production and development work is suspended.

Pinchuk’s other proposal would see the oligarch trump Energees cash bid with a comparatively simple 25 pence per share cash takeover bid.

Another possibility would be the least attractive for Regal’s investors.

Should the Energees offer fail to receive the necessary level of support then it may choose to let the offer expire - it could extend it too – and without a firm offer from Pinchuk this may send Regal’s share much lower as the ‘bid premium’  evaporates.

Regal stressed that it is currently trying to secure a superior offer from Heamoor and Geo-Alliance, but there can be no guarantee that a firm offer will be put to shareholders. It emphasised that timing was a key factor due to the complex nature of Pinchuk’s proposals,

The company said:  "the board of Regal continues to recommend the Energees Offer until such time as a superior firm offer is put forward to Regal shareholders.”

Regal's shares were this morning suspended on AIM.

 

No investment advice

The Company is a publisher and is not registered with or authorised by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. You further understand that none of the information providers or their affiliates will advise you personally concerning the nature, potential, advisability, value or suitability of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, investment strategy, or other matter.

You understand that the Site may contain opinions from time to time with regard to securities mentioned in other products, including company related products, and that those opinions may be different from those obtained by using another product related to the Company. You understand and agree that contributors may write about securities in which they or their firms have a position, and that they may trade such securities for their own account. In cases where the position is held at the time of publication and such position is known to the Company, appropriate disclosure is made. However, you understand and agree that at the time of any transaction that you make, one or more contributors may have a position in the securities written about. You understand that price and other data is supplied by sources believed to be reliable, that the calculations herein are made using such data, and that neither such data nor such calculations are guaranteed by these sources, the Company, the information providers or any other person or entity, and may not be complete or accurate.

From time to time, reference may be made in our marketing materials to prior articles and opinions we have published. These references may be selective, may reference only a portion of an article or recommendation, and are likely not to be current. As markets change continuously, previously published information and data may not be current and should not be relied upon.